<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richard Stallman&#8217;s &#8216;Right To Read&#8217; dystopia growing closer every day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2006/02/25/richard-stallmans-right-to-read-dystopia-growing-closer-every-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2006/02/25/richard-stallmans-right-to-read-dystopia-growing-closer-every-day/</link>
	<description>Design and human behaviour</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:34:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some links at fulminate // Architectures of Control</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2006/02/25/richard-stallmans-right-to-read-dystopia-growing-closer-every-day/comment-page-1/#comment-30881</link>
		<dc:creator>Some links at fulminate // Architectures of Control</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?p=40#comment-30881</guid>
		<description>[...] George Preston very kindly reminds me of the excellent Trusted Computing FAQ by Ross Anderson, a fantastic exposition of the arguments. For more on Vista&#8217;s &#8216;trusted&#8217; computing issues, Peter Guttmann has some very clear explanations of how shocking far we are from anything sensible. See also Richard Stallman&#8217;s &#8216;Right to Read&#8217;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] George Preston very kindly reminds me of the excellent Trusted Computing FAQ by Ross Anderson, a fantastic exposition of the arguments. For more on Vista&#8217;s &#8216;trusted&#8217; computing issues, Peter Guttmann has some very clear explanations of how shocking far we are from anything sensible. See also Richard Stallman&#8217;s &#8216;Right to Read&#8217;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Review: Everyware by Adam Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2006/02/25/richard-stallmans-right-to-read-dystopia-growing-closer-every-day/comment-page-1/#comment-2059</link>
		<dc:creator>Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Review: Everyware by Adam Greenfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 23:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?p=40#comment-2059</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s not hard to see that with this level of unknowingly/unwillingly active everyware in the environment, there could be a lot of &#8216;architectures of control&#8217; consequences. For example, systems which constrain users&#8217; behaviour based on some arbitrary profile: a vending machine may refuse to serve a high-fat snack to someone whose RFID pay-card identifies him/her as obese; or, more critically, only a censored version of the internet or a library catalogue may be available to someone whose profile identifies him/her as likely to be &#8216;unduly&#8217; influenced by certain materials, according to some arbitrary definition. Yes, Richard Stallman&#8217;s Right To Read prophecy could well come to pass through individual profiling by networked ubiquitous computing power, in an even more sinister form than he anticipated. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s not hard to see that with this level of unknowingly/unwillingly active everyware in the environment, there could be a lot of &#8216;architectures of control&#8217; consequences. For example, systems which constrain users&#8217; behaviour based on some arbitrary profile: a vending machine may refuse to serve a high-fat snack to someone whose RFID pay-card identifies him/her as obese; or, more critically, only a censored version of the internet or a library catalogue may be available to someone whose profile identifies him/her as likely to be &#8216;unduly&#8217; influenced by certain materials, according to some arbitrary definition. Yes, Richard Stallman&#8217;s Right To Read prophecy could well come to pass through individual profiling by networked ubiquitous computing power, in an even more sinister form than he anticipated. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Oh yeah, that Windows Kill Switch</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2006/02/25/richard-stallmans-right-to-read-dystopia-growing-closer-every-day/comment-page-1/#comment-1809</link>
		<dc:creator>Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Oh yeah, that Windows Kill Switch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?p=40#comment-1809</guid>
		<description>[...] I know the furore surrounding Microsoft&#8217;s &#8216;Windows Genuine Advantage&#8217; is a few days old, and perhaps I should have blogged about it at the time, specifically the rumoured &#8216;Kill Switch&#8217; which would remotely deactivate any PCs apparently running &#8216;non-genuine&#8217; copies of XP. That&#8217;s certainly a candidate for my feature deletion/external control category, as well as treacherous computing, and ranks far more severely than, say, removing mp3 capability from a phone after a mandatory upgrade. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I know the furore surrounding Microsoft&#8217;s &#8216;Windows Genuine Advantage&#8217; is a few days old, and perhaps I should have blogged about it at the time, specifically the rumoured &#8216;Kill Switch&#8217; which would remotely deactivate any PCs apparently running &#8216;non-genuine&#8217; copies of XP. That&#8217;s certainly a candidate for my feature deletion/external control category, as well as treacherous computing, and ranks far more severely than, say, removing mp3 capability from a phone after a mandatory upgrade. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Philips: You MUST watch these adverts</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2006/02/25/richard-stallmans-right-to-read-dystopia-growing-closer-every-day/comment-page-1/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Philips: You MUST watch these adverts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?p=40#comment-555</guid>
		<description>[...] Now this really is a pretty daft proposition, at least as the consumer electronics market is now: Philips does not have a near-monopoly (unlike the companies behind &#8216;trusted&#8217; computing) nor is there legislation to force new devices to use this technology (though who knows what&#8217;s over the horizon?). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now this really is a pretty daft proposition, at least as the consumer electronics market is now: Philips does not have a near-monopoly (unlike the companies behind &#8216;trusted&#8217; computing) nor is there legislation to force new devices to use this technology (though who knows what&#8217;s over the horizon?). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

