<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Control information even after it has been delivered&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2006/03/03/control-information-even-after-it-has-been-delivered/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2006/03/03/control-information-even-after-it-has-been-delivered/</link>
	<description>How do people use products, systems and environments?  How can designers influence interaction?  How can we design for sustainable behaviour?</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Architectures of control that actually endanger life</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2006/03/03/control-information-even-after-it-has-been-delivered/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Architectures of control that actually endanger life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 16:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?p=44#comment-151</guid>
		<description>[...] More broadly in the DRM realm - &#8220;controlling information even after it has been delivered&#8221; - as discussed here - and &#8216;trusted computing&#8217; in general would seem to open up many possible cases where life could be endangered as a direct or indirect result. Say an organisation (a school, a workplace, even a family) has a medical reference encyclopaedia in a digital format (maybe they&#8217;ve been encouraged to ditch the paper copy altogether because of how &#8216;convenient&#8217; it&#8217;ll be just to pop in a CD). Say that the computer becomes unusable through either DRM leading to insecurity, or &#8216;trusted&#8217; computing locking it up, or even the medical encyclopaedia &#8216;expiring&#8217; after a certain amount of time. Those three possibilities aren&#8217;t that unlikely, and in each case, life would be endangered. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More broadly in the DRM realm - &#8220;controlling information even after it has been delivered&#8221; - as discussed here - and &#8216;trusted computing&#8217; in general would seem to open up many possible cases where life could be endangered as a direct or indirect result. Say an organisation (a school, a workplace, even a family) has a medical reference encyclopaedia in a digital format (maybe they&#8217;ve been encouraged to ditch the paper copy altogether because of how &#8216;convenient&#8217; it&#8217;ll be just to pop in a CD). Say that the computer becomes unusable through either DRM leading to insecurity, or &#8216;trusted&#8217; computing locking it up, or even the medical encyclopaedia &#8216;expiring&#8217; after a certain amount of time. Those three possibilities aren&#8217;t that unlikely, and in each case, life would be endangered. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
