<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is design political?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2006/04/29/is-design-political/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2006/04/29/is-design-political/</link>
	<description>Design and human behaviour</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:34:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Neuros: &#8216;Freedom by Design&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2006/04/29/is-design-political/comment-page-1/#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator>Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Neuros: &#8216;Freedom by Design&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 21:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?p=63#comment-1632</guid>
		<description>[...] This is just the kind of intelligent engagement by product designers &amp; engineers with the political implications of - and influences on - their work for which I&#8217;ve been looking throughout the &#8216;Architectures of Control&#8217; project. Whether it meets the kind of criteria proposed by Jennie Winhall&#8217;s &#8216;Is Design Political?&#8216;, I don&#8217;t know, but by standing up for users&#8217; rights in such an open and frank way, and indeed structuring its business around that philosophy, Neuros seems a lot closer to real user-centred design than the vague waffle so often promulgated as such. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is just the kind of intelligent engagement by product designers &#38; engineers with the political implications of &#8211; and influences on &#8211; their work for which I&#8217;ve been looking throughout the &#8216;Architectures of Control&#8217; project. Whether it meets the kind of criteria proposed by Jennie Winhall&#8217;s &#8216;Is Design Political?&#8216;, I don&#8217;t know, but by standing up for users&#8217; rights in such an open and frank way, and indeed structuring its business around that philosophy, Neuros seems a lot closer to real user-centred design than the vague waffle so often promulgated as such. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

