<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: We Know What You Want by Martin Howard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2006/10/03/review-we-know-what-you-want-by-martin-howard-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2006/10/03/review-we-know-what-you-want-by-martin-howard-2/</link>
	<description>Design and human behaviour</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:34:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coercive atmospherics reach the bus shelter at fulminate // Architectures of Control</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2006/10/03/review-we-know-what-you-want-by-martin-howard-2/comment-page-1/#comment-30814</link>
		<dc:creator>Coercive atmospherics reach the bus shelter at fulminate // Architectures of Control</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?p=132#comment-30814</guid>
		<description>[...] The use of scent (fresh bread, coffee, &#8216;new car smell&#8217; etc) as a persuasion method is nothing new in supermarkets and other retail environments - as part of coercive atmospherics, Douglas Rushkoff and Martin Howard both have interesting treatments of various approaches and results - but the balance does begin to shift when the application is so public. I would suspect a lot of the opposition in San Francisco was really more about the inescapable incursion of the commercial message into a public environment than the allergy concerns; as Jonathan puts it: Unlike the use of even large billboards, there’s no easy way to avert your nose the way you can avert your eyes, making the advertising much more invasive. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The use of scent (fresh bread, coffee, &#8216;new car smell&#8217; etc) as a persuasion method is nothing new in supermarkets and other retail environments &#8211; as part of coercive atmospherics, Douglas Rushkoff and Martin Howard both have interesting treatments of various approaches and results &#8211; but the balance does begin to shift when the application is so public. I would suspect a lot of the opposition in San Francisco was really more about the inescapable incursion of the commercial message into a public environment than the allergy concerns; as Jonathan puts it: Unlike the use of even large billboards, there’s no easy way to avert your nose the way you can avert your eyes, making the advertising much more invasive. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

