<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coercive atmospherics reach the bus shelter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/01/16/coercive-atmospherics-reach-the-bus-shelter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/01/16/coercive-atmospherics-reach-the-bus-shelter/</link>
	<description>Design and human behaviour</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:34:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why does Subway smell the way it does? &#171; Light Up The Rain</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/01/16/coercive-atmospherics-reach-the-bus-shelter/comment-page-1/#comment-417907</link>
		<dc:creator>Why does Subway smell the way it does? &#171; Light Up The Rain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/01/16/coercive-atmospherics-reach-the-bus-shelter/#comment-417907</guid>
		<description>[...] emissions in your face, plenty of other people will be in future. There’s even a name for it: coercive atmospherics. Consider this 2006 experiment on behalf of the California Milk Processing Board: A bus shelter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] emissions in your face, plenty of other people will be in future. There’s even a name for it: coercive atmospherics. Consider this 2006 experiment on behalf of the California Milk Processing Board: A bus shelter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sneezy</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/01/16/coercive-atmospherics-reach-the-bus-shelter/comment-page-1/#comment-124214</link>
		<dc:creator>sneezy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/01/16/coercive-atmospherics-reach-the-bus-shelter/#comment-124214</guid>
		<description>&quot;I would suspect a lot of the opposition in San Francisco was really more about the inescapable incursion of the commercial message into a public environment than the allergy concerns;&quot;

I&#039;m always amused by the degree to which we humans assume that what has Importance to us personally must carry an equal amount of weight in the general case. :) As someone who is literally prohibited from occupying space infused with the output of mis-named &quot;air fresheners&quot; by my bodies histamine response, I can assure you that not all objections were purely based on cognitive intrusion. There are a lot of asthma sufferers out there! Scenting any public place is a Bad Thing - I personally have trouble with sitting next to someone on a bus who&#039;s clothing reeks of scented dryer sheets, even. Please don&#039;t belittle what is a problematic aspect of shared spaces for many people (more than you would think, since any attempt to explain the situation often prove to be extremely unrewarding, so I, and probably others, no longer bother).

That said, thanks for a very interesting read!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I would suspect a lot of the opposition in San Francisco was really more about the inescapable incursion of the commercial message into a public environment than the allergy concerns;&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m always amused by the degree to which we humans assume that what has Importance to us personally must carry an equal amount of weight in the general case. <img src='http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  As someone who is literally prohibited from occupying space infused with the output of mis-named &#8220;air fresheners&#8221; by my bodies histamine response, I can assure you that not all objections were purely based on cognitive intrusion. There are a lot of asthma sufferers out there! Scenting any public place is a Bad Thing &#8211; I personally have trouble with sitting next to someone on a bus who&#8217;s clothing reeks of scented dryer sheets, even. Please don&#8217;t belittle what is a problematic aspect of shared spaces for many people (more than you would think, since any attempt to explain the situation often prove to be extremely unrewarding, so I, and probably others, no longer bother).</p>
<p>That said, thanks for a very interesting read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crosbie Fitch</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/01/16/coercive-atmospherics-reach-the-bus-shelter/comment-page-1/#comment-30899</link>
		<dc:creator>Crosbie Fitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/01/16/coercive-atmospherics-reach-the-bus-shelter/#comment-30899</guid>
		<description>air &#039;fresheners&#039; do not actually freshen the air, they mask odours that are symptomatic of a problem that should be addressed directly. The odours are critical information and its removal makes the problem they betray less likely to receive the attention it deserves.

Covering up the smell of gangrene is not a good idea.

Any artificial odours should ADD valuable information, not remove it.

For example, adding odour to flammable but odourless gas.

The best thing advertisers could do for bus shelters would be to CLEAN them up so that people didn&#039;t associate their products with unhygenic public urinals.

If all shelters that advertised a cleaning product were cleaned, whereas all those that didn&#039;t smelt like cat&#039;s piss, well, that might work - until the advertisers deliberately started encouraging cats to piss at other shelters...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>air &#8216;fresheners&#8217; do not actually freshen the air, they mask odours that are symptomatic of a problem that should be addressed directly. The odours are critical information and its removal makes the problem they betray less likely to receive the attention it deserves.</p>
<p>Covering up the smell of gangrene is not a good idea.</p>
<p>Any artificial odours should ADD valuable information, not remove it.</p>
<p>For example, adding odour to flammable but odourless gas.</p>
<p>The best thing advertisers could do for bus shelters would be to CLEAN them up so that people didn&#8217;t associate their products with unhygenic public urinals.</p>
<p>If all shelters that advertised a cleaning product were cleaned, whereas all those that didn&#8217;t smelt like cat&#8217;s piss, well, that might work &#8211; until the advertisers deliberately started encouraging cats to piss at other shelters&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

