<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The right to click</title>
	<atom:link href="http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/</link>
	<description>Design and human behaviour</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:34:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frankie Roberto&#8217;s weblog - A backlash against public online image archives?</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/comment-page-1/#comment-296344</link>
		<dc:creator>Frankie Roberto&#8217;s weblog - A backlash against public online image archives?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/#comment-296344</guid>
		<description>[...] Lockton points out the English Heritage website&#8217;s cynical disabling of the right click function, using [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lockton points out the English Heritage website&#8217;s cynical disabling of the right click function, using [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun McDonald</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/comment-page-1/#comment-86081</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/#comment-86081</guid>
		<description>In Safari on Mac OS X, I have no problems with doing a right click on the linked page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Safari on Mac OS X, I have no problems with doing a right click on the linked page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valentin</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/comment-page-1/#comment-85187</link>
		<dc:creator>Valentin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/#comment-85187</guid>
		<description>This &quot;no-right-click&quot; scripts are even more anoying for people (like me) that are using mouse gestures to navigate. Most mouse gestures are done by holding the right mouse button and making some movements with the mouse, e.g. hold right mouse button and move mouse a bit to the left = browser back to last page. Mouse gestures are build into Opera and supported by a Firefox plugin - and they really speed up the work with the browser .... unless you come accross one of these pages, where you are not only stopped from copying but from all uses of the right mouse button ... 

And really these things are sooo easy to bypass - no need to worry about disabling JavaScript - as long as the image fits on your screen: use screen capture (and there are numerous free tools that allow to capture only a part of the screen, doing away with the need to crop the picture afterwards). This also works with pics embedded in flash .. or anything actually :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This &#8220;no-right-click&#8221; scripts are even more anoying for people (like me) that are using mouse gestures to navigate. Most mouse gestures are done by holding the right mouse button and making some movements with the mouse, e.g. hold right mouse button and move mouse a bit to the left = browser back to last page. Mouse gestures are build into Opera and supported by a Firefox plugin &#8211; and they really speed up the work with the browser &#8230;. unless you come accross one of these pages, where you are not only stopped from copying but from all uses of the right mouse button &#8230; </p>
<p>And really these things are sooo easy to bypass &#8211; no need to worry about disabling JavaScript &#8211; as long as the image fits on your screen: use screen capture (and there are numerous free tools that allow to capture only a part of the screen, doing away with the need to crop the picture afterwards). This also works with pics embedded in flash .. or anything actually <img src='http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crosbie Fitch</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/comment-page-1/#comment-79705</link>
		<dc:creator>Crosbie Fitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/#comment-79705</guid>
		<description>Go here:
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ie=UTF8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;hl=en&amp;q=&amp;ll=51.153697,-0.191499&amp;spn=0.002069,0.003927&amp;t=k&amp;z=19&amp;om=1

Try using Google&#039;s option to print the map. It decides you don&#039;t want the satellite image, but the road map. Duh? So, you have to use Alt-Print-Scrn and crop the thing and print it using some image processing app. This is making things easy.

I dare not mention Ordnance Survey and how &#039;easy&#039; they have made it to print a map (that the fricking taxpayer already paid for).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go here:<br />
<a href="http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ie=UTF8&#038;oe=UTF-8&#038;hl=en&#038;q=&#038;ll=51.153697,-0.191499&#038;spn=0.002069,0.003927&#038;t=k&#038;z=19&#038;om=1" rel="nofollow">http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?ie=UTF8&#038;oe=UTF-8&#038;hl=en&#038;q=&#038;ll=51.153697,-0.191499&#038;spn=0.002069,0.003927&#038;t=k&#038;z=19&#038;om=1</a></p>
<p>Try using Google&#8217;s option to print the map. It decides you don&#8217;t want the satellite image, but the road map. Duh? So, you have to use Alt-Print-Scrn and crop the thing and print it using some image processing app. This is making things easy.</p>
<p>I dare not mention Ordnance Survey and how &#8216;easy&#8217; they have made it to print a map (that the fricking taxpayer already paid for).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Relatos</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/comment-page-1/#comment-79038</link>
		<dc:creator>Relatos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 16:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/#comment-79038</guid>
		<description>I like your blog, but I think that this subject is the most interesting of your last posts. Bye, Lucy Relatos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your blog, but I think that this subject is the most interesting of your last posts. Bye, Lucy Relatos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/comment-page-1/#comment-77775</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 09:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/#comment-77775</guid>
		<description>Hi Paddy,

Thanks for the comment. Could you let me know - did you actually click on the &#039;Enlarge&#039; link on &lt;a href=&quot;http://viewfinder.english-heritage.org.uk/search/reference.asp?index=1&amp;main_query=&amp;theme=&amp;period=&amp;county=&amp;district=&amp;place_name=datchet&amp;imageUID=45855&quot;&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt;? And then right-click on the enlarged image?

Doing a bit more experimentation, it is true that the Javascript &#039;protection&#039; doesn&#039;t seem particularly robust. E.g. in IE6, the right-click menu does not appear, but the little &#039;Picture toolbar&#039; does eventually appear (and allow you to save/print etc as you say).

That seems to suggest a misguided/poorly implemented system (as Aaron notes) rather than a really serious attempt to prevent the user copying the image, and I apologise if my comments were a little harsh. But I still don&#039;t see why any kind of restriction - whether effective or not - is needed.

Noneof2&#039;s instructions above are great for circumventing this kind of restriction when you come across it elsewhere, and where it&#039;s more robustly implemented. 

Vera&#039;s comment, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://gcoupe.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!6AA39937A982345B!3875.entry&quot;&gt;Geoff&#039;s mention&lt;/a&gt; of the OnOneMap / Environment Agency &lt;a href=&quot;http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,2118152,00.html&quot;&gt;flood data débâcle&lt;/a&gt; illustrate something even worse about the tendency of public bodies to &lt;a href=&quot;http://freeourdata.org.uk/blog/&quot;&gt;lock up publicly funded data&lt;/a&gt;: the often complete intransigence when faced with people who want to build on the information or use it in a way which is (often &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ononeblog.com/?p=28&quot;&gt;more) beneficial&lt;/a&gt; to the public. On the subject of image collections again, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.frankieroberto.com/weblog/07-2007.xhtml&quot;&gt;Frankie Roberto&lt;/a&gt; points to &lt;a href=&quot;http://public.resource.org/memo.2007.05.19.html&quot;&gt;Public Resource&#039;s eloquent criticism (and subversion) of the Smithsonian&#039;s restrictions on its online image library.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paddy,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment. Could you let me know &#8211; did you actually click on the &#8216;Enlarge&#8217; link on <a href="http://viewfinder.english-heritage.org.uk/search/reference.asp?index=1&#038;main_query=&#038;theme=&#038;period=&#038;county=&#038;district=&#038;place_name=datchet&#038;imageUID=45855">this page</a>? And then right-click on the enlarged image?</p>
<p>Doing a bit more experimentation, it is true that the Javascript &#8216;protection&#8217; doesn&#8217;t seem particularly robust. E.g. in IE6, the right-click menu does not appear, but the little &#8216;Picture toolbar&#8217; does eventually appear (and allow you to save/print etc as you say).</p>
<p>That seems to suggest a misguided/poorly implemented system (as Aaron notes) rather than a really serious attempt to prevent the user copying the image, and I apologise if my comments were a little harsh. But I still don&#8217;t see why any kind of restriction &#8211; whether effective or not &#8211; is needed.</p>
<p>Noneof2&#8242;s instructions above are great for circumventing this kind of restriction when you come across it elsewhere, and where it&#8217;s more robustly implemented. </p>
<p>Vera&#8217;s comment, and <a href="http://gcoupe.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!6AA39937A982345B!3875.entry">Geoff&#8217;s mention</a> of the OnOneMap / Environment Agency <a href="http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,2118152,00.html">flood data débâcle</a> illustrate something even worse about the tendency of public bodies to <a href="http://freeourdata.org.uk/blog/">lock up publicly funded data</a>: the often complete intransigence when faced with people who want to build on the information or use it in a way which is (often <a href="http://www.ononeblog.com/?p=28">more) beneficial</a> to the public. On the subject of image collections again, <a href="http://www.frankieroberto.com/weblog/07-2007.xhtml">Frankie Roberto</a> points to <a href="http://public.resource.org/memo.2007.05.19.html">Public Resource&#8217;s eloquent criticism (and subversion) of the Smithsonian&#8217;s restrictions on its online image library.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OLDaily[中文版] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2007年7月5日</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/comment-page-1/#comment-76748</link>
		<dc:creator>OLDaily[中文版] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2007年7月5日</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 12:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/#comment-76748</guid>
		<description>[...] 有权点击 我认为博物馆和图书馆的管理者们需要重新思考，到底谁拥有他们所管理的文物。这些物品——它们所记录的形象很早就已成为公共产品了——属于人民，属于我们 所有人共同拥有。这意味着，管理者若不让大家利用这些文物，那就大错特错了——这里我说的是他们禁止人们复制。有些博物馆禁止拍照（就好象台湾的那座博物 馆，禁止我拍摄有6000年之久的文物——我着实认为有效期已经过了，我也怀疑创造者还有动力去创造任何新的有6000年历史的文物）。从现在开始——管 长们，把我们的文化遗产还给我们。Dan Lockton, Architectures of Control July 5, 2007 [原文链接] [Tags: none] [参与评论] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 有权点击 我认为博物馆和图书馆的管理者们需要重新思考，到底谁拥有他们所管理的文物。这些物品——它们所记录的形象很早就已成为公共产品了——属于人民，属于我们 所有人共同拥有。这意味着，管理者若不让大家利用这些文物，那就大错特错了——这里我说的是他们禁止人们复制。有些博物馆禁止拍照（就好象台湾的那座博物 馆，禁止我拍摄有6000年之久的文物——我着实认为有效期已经过了，我也怀疑创造者还有动力去创造任何新的有6000年历史的文物）。从现在开始——管 长们，把我们的文化遗产还给我们。Dan Lockton, Architectures of Control July 5, 2007 [原文链接] [Tags: none] [参与评论] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick o'hara</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/comment-page-1/#comment-76700</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick o'hara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 06:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/#comment-76700</guid>
		<description>Dear Dan

First up stumbled on this by accident and as I work for EH I thought I would try it out. I tried to access the image at work fine no problem it worked perfectly with a right click. Then I thought perhaps thats because I am logged on at work so here I am this morning on my own PC very basic and again no problems with the Datchet image or with a couple of others. Right clicked saved to desk top and it would email and print from there if I wanted to.
By the way very pleased to have made acquaintenance with your blog as a non techie I hope to return and try to learn something more.

Best regards
Paddy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Dan</p>
<p>First up stumbled on this by accident and as I work for EH I thought I would try it out. I tried to access the image at work fine no problem it worked perfectly with a right click. Then I thought perhaps thats because I am logged on at work so here I am this morning on my own PC very basic and again no problems with the Datchet image or with a couple of others. Right clicked saved to desk top and it would email and print from there if I wanted to.<br />
By the way very pleased to have made acquaintenance with your blog as a non techie I hope to return and try to learn something more.</p>
<p>Best regards<br />
Paddy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: None of 2</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/comment-page-1/#comment-76624</link>
		<dc:creator>None of 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 17:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/#comment-76624</guid>
		<description>Oh and did I mention that if you can get the image&#039;s URL (and you can, e.g. by viewing the page source or even using browser features to list all the page elements and their URLs) you can save a copy? Just paste the URL into the address bar for the high-res image, then right click and &quot;Save As&quot; or File...Save As. Or download it programmatically. It&#039;s doable with about three lines of non-boilerplate Java code, thanks to the rich class library that comes with the language. Wget works too, if they don&#039;t deny images to robots on the site. If it won&#039;t work you can probably configure wget to spoof an IE user-agent and ignore robots.txt. Of course you can also throw together a file called &quot;foo.html&quot; containing a single plain-text link to the image file URL, then right click THAT and &quot;save as&quot;. If the site feeds you something different for the same URL than the image, throw in Proxomitron and spoof the referer (sic) as the URL of the page on which the image is hosted.

There are always ways to beat these b*stards at their own games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and did I mention that if you can get the image&#8217;s URL (and you can, e.g. by viewing the page source or even using browser features to list all the page elements and their URLs) you can save a copy? Just paste the URL into the address bar for the high-res image, then right click and &#8220;Save As&#8221; or File&#8230;Save As. Or download it programmatically. It&#8217;s doable with about three lines of non-boilerplate Java code, thanks to the rich class library that comes with the language. Wget works too, if they don&#8217;t deny images to robots on the site. If it won&#8217;t work you can probably configure wget to spoof an IE user-agent and ignore robots.txt. Of course you can also throw together a file called &#8220;foo.html&#8221; containing a single plain-text link to the image file URL, then right click THAT and &#8220;save as&#8221;. If the site feeds you something different for the same URL than the image, throw in Proxomitron and spoof the referer (sic) as the URL of the page on which the image is hosted.</p>
<p>There are always ways to beat these b*stards at their own games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: None of 2</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/comment-page-1/#comment-76622</link>
		<dc:creator>None of 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 17:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/#comment-76622</guid>
		<description>The livelihood of museums and art galleries may depend on it, but there is no entitlement to it nonetheless. If something is in the public domain, then there should certainly be no, I repeat NO DRM associated with it. And of course if something is taxpayer-funded it should be public domain!

As for getting around this kind of insipid and stupid DRM, it&#039;s easy. One way is to use Firefox. Tools menu, Options, Content, enable Javascript, and &quot;Advanced...&quot; and uncheck all the evil things (move, resize, &lt;b&gt;disable or replace context menus&lt;/b&gt;, mess with the status bar...) -- right click should now work. Also, sites should no longer be able to mislead you as to where a link is going by blocking the destination URL appearing in the status bar when you point at the link, which is important for detecting some outright evil things, including bogus links on phishing sites.

A second method is to simply zoom the image and hit print-screen. Open photoshop, hit paste, and crop the windows-cruft out from around the image of interest. (This also often works to get at some other DRMed stuff. Individual video frames from a DVD for instance. It&#039;s also useful for capturing modal dialogs or error messages or EULA text that isn&#039;t selectable for copying to the clipboard, so you can later transcribe it easily or otherwise reference it or use it. Print screen and Firefox - saving a little bit of our few remaining fair use rights every day.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The livelihood of museums and art galleries may depend on it, but there is no entitlement to it nonetheless. If something is in the public domain, then there should certainly be no, I repeat NO DRM associated with it. And of course if something is taxpayer-funded it should be public domain!</p>
<p>As for getting around this kind of insipid and stupid DRM, it&#8217;s easy. One way is to use Firefox. Tools menu, Options, Content, enable Javascript, and &#8220;Advanced&#8230;&#8221; and uncheck all the evil things (move, resize, <b>disable or replace context menus</b>, mess with the status bar&#8230;) &#8212; right click should now work. Also, sites should no longer be able to mislead you as to where a link is going by blocking the destination URL appearing in the status bar when you point at the link, which is important for detecting some outright evil things, including bogus links on phishing sites.</p>
<p>A second method is to simply zoom the image and hit print-screen. Open photoshop, hit paste, and crop the windows-cruft out from around the image of interest. (This also often works to get at some other DRMed stuff. Individual video frames from a DVD for instance. It&#8217;s also useful for capturing modal dialogs or error messages or EULA text that isn&#8217;t selectable for copying to the clipboard, so you can later transcribe it easily or otherwise reference it or use it. Print screen and Firefox &#8211; saving a little bit of our few remaining fair use rights every day.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Coupe</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/comment-page-1/#comment-76562</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Coupe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/#comment-76562</guid>
		<description>This attitude of actively thwarting the intent to &quot;serve the public&quot; seems to be despressingly common. By coincidence, the Guardian today is running a story on how the Environment Agency (another public body) has moved to stop an outside side (OnOneMap) from offering its flood data in a more usable form to prospective housebuyers. 

See http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,2118152,00.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This attitude of actively thwarting the intent to &#8220;serve the public&#8221; seems to be despressingly common. By coincidence, the Guardian today is running a story on how the Environment Agency (another public body) has moved to stop an outside side (OnOneMap) from offering its flood data in a more usable form to prospective housebuyers. </p>
<p>See <a href="http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,2118152,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,2118152,00.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/comment-page-1/#comment-76542</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 04:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/#comment-76542</guid>
		<description>There is a valid reasoning for this sort of DRM in general the livelihood of museums and art galleries depends on being the only one to display some picture or have near-perfect reproductions of images. However, because this is a publicly funded group, they exist for the public good, and in this case, it is in the best interests of the public to be able to access these pictures in any format they deem necessary. 

I could understand if they were just stopping massive downloads of their images, but disabling right click is a little excessive. God forbid I want to save a whole dozen of these images one-by-one.

On a side note, I love how, in my browser, the Javascript alert appears after I&#039;ve right clicked and save the image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a valid reasoning for this sort of DRM in general the livelihood of museums and art galleries depends on being the only one to display some picture or have near-perfect reproductions of images. However, because this is a publicly funded group, they exist for the public good, and in this case, it is in the best interests of the public to be able to access these pictures in any format they deem necessary. </p>
<p>I could understand if they were just stopping massive downloads of their images, but disabling right click is a little excessive. God forbid I want to save a whole dozen of these images one-by-one.</p>
<p>On a side note, I love how, in my browser, the Javascript alert appears after I&#8217;ve right clicked and save the image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vera Bass</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/comment-page-1/#comment-76516</link>
		<dc:creator>Vera Bass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 22:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/#comment-76516</guid>
		<description>This zeroes in on one of my biggest frustrations, which is the terror almost all cultural institutions have of image theft. Most museums and galleries that I am personally familiar with are served by the most conservative and old fashioned ivory tower IP lawyers in their respective communities, and they, like all the other board members and benefactors tend to share an attitude focused only on protecting precious historical artifacts. Curators and those concerned with drawing public attendance are typically hamstrung by this attitude of their &#039;superiors&#039;.

Many of us bemoan the paucity of culture on the web. We tend to be very familiar with the endless copyright wrangles relating to, for example, films. Most of us do not realize that our primary custodial institutions are yet so far removed from this new electronic world we inhabit as to be another species or on another planet. Yet it is, as you say, our cultural history.

The quality of print information available online increases with time (despite the attendant volume of drek) yet the availability of images stagnates in comparison.

(end rant :))

Vera</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This zeroes in on one of my biggest frustrations, which is the terror almost all cultural institutions have of image theft. Most museums and galleries that I am personally familiar with are served by the most conservative and old fashioned ivory tower IP lawyers in their respective communities, and they, like all the other board members and benefactors tend to share an attitude focused only on protecting precious historical artifacts. Curators and those concerned with drawing public attendance are typically hamstrung by this attitude of their &#8216;superiors&#8217;.</p>
<p>Many of us bemoan the paucity of culture on the web. We tend to be very familiar with the endless copyright wrangles relating to, for example, films. Most of us do not realize that our primary custodial institutions are yet so far removed from this new electronic world we inhabit as to be another species or on another planet. Yet it is, as you say, our cultural history.</p>
<p>The quality of print information available online increases with time (despite the attendant volume of drek) yet the availability of images stagnates in comparison.</p>
<p>(end rant <img src='http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
<p>Vera</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: University Update - DRM - The right to click</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/comment-page-1/#comment-76501</link>
		<dc:creator>University Update - DRM - The right to click</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 20:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/07/04/the-right-to-click/#comment-76501</guid>
		<description>[...] YouTube                       Link to Article                drm The right to click &#187;  Posted at  fulminate // Architectures of Control on Wednesday, July 04, 2007   English Heritage, officially the Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England, and funded by the taxpayer and by visitors to some of its properties, does a great deal of very good work in widening public appreciation of, and engagement with, history and the country’s heritage  View Entire Article &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] YouTube                       Link to Article                drm The right to click &#187;  Posted at  fulminate // Architectures of Control on Wednesday, July 04, 2007   English Heritage, officially the Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England, and funded by the taxpayer and by visitors to some of its properties, does a great deal of very good work in widening public appreciation of, and engagement with, history and the country’s heritage  View Entire Article &#187; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

