<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In default, defiance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/08/08/in-default-defiance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/08/08/in-default-defiance/</link>
	<description>Design and human behaviour</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:33:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adaptive path &#187; blog &#187; Peter Merholz &#187; Signposts for the Week ending August 10, 2007</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/08/08/in-default-defiance/comment-page-1/#comment-85378</link>
		<dc:creator>adaptive path &#187; blog &#187; Peter Merholz &#187; Signposts for the Week ending August 10, 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 16:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/08/08/in-default-defiance/#comment-85378</guid>
		<description>[...] The power of defaults in interaction design. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The power of defaults in interaction design. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: None of 3</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/08/08/in-default-defiance/comment-page-1/#comment-85088</link>
		<dc:creator>None of 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 14:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/08/08/in-default-defiance/#comment-85088</guid>
		<description>Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Default at Miscellaneous Objections</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/08/08/in-default-defiance/comment-page-1/#comment-84816</link>
		<dc:creator>Default at Miscellaneous Objections</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 05:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/08/08/in-default-defiance/#comment-84816</guid>
		<description>[...] Architectures of Control looks at what happened when Adobe tried to steer business toward FedEx Kinko&#8217;s. Other printers got upset, and a default setting was removed from the product. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Architectures of Control looks at what happened when Adobe tried to steer business toward FedEx Kinko&#8217;s. Other printers got upset, and a default setting was removed from the product. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/08/08/in-default-defiance/comment-page-1/#comment-84813</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 05:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/08/08/in-default-defiance/#comment-84813</guid>
		<description>Thanks for letting me know, I&#039;ve fixed them now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for letting me know, I&#8217;ve fixed them now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: None of 3</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/08/08/in-default-defiance/comment-page-1/#comment-84782</link>
		<dc:creator>None of 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 23:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/08/08/in-default-defiance/#comment-84782</guid>
		<description>Links don&#039;t work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Links don&#8217;t work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/08/08/in-default-defiance/comment-page-1/#comment-84688</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 14:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/08/08/in-default-defiance/#comment-84688</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.RajivShah.com&quot;&gt;Rajiv Shah&lt;/a&gt; sends me this:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I noticed your nice post on defaults today. I just wanted to point
out defaults play an important role (both in software and in other
avenues, such as contracts) and have been studied by a wide range of
scholars.  Here are two papers I have recently written on defaults:
(you can see the abstracts and download the papers by following the
link)

Rajiv


Kesan, J. P., &amp; Shah, R.C. (2006). Setting Software Defaults:
Perspectives from Law, Computer Science and Behavioral Economics.
Notre Dame Law Review, 82(2), 583-634, &lt;a href=&quot;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=906816&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;

Shah, R.C., &amp; Sandvig, C. (in press). Defaults as De Facto
Regulation: The Case of Wireless Access Points. Information,
Communication and Society &lt;a href=&quot;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=964950&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I haven&#039;t read his papers yet, but they sound interesting and relevant to the issue of defaults.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.RajivShah.com">Rajiv Shah</a> sends me this:</p>
<blockquote><p>I noticed your nice post on defaults today. I just wanted to point<br />
out defaults play an important role (both in software and in other<br />
avenues, such as contracts) and have been studied by a wide range of<br />
scholars.  Here are two papers I have recently written on defaults:<br />
(you can see the abstracts and download the papers by following the<br />
link)</p>
<p>Rajiv</p>
<p>Kesan, J. P., &#038; Shah, R.C. (2006). Setting Software Defaults:<br />
Perspectives from Law, Computer Science and Behavioral Economics.<br />
Notre Dame Law Review, 82(2), 583-634, <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=906816">link</a></p>
<p>Shah, R.C., &#038; Sandvig, C. (in press). Defaults as De Facto<br />
Regulation: The Case of Wireless Access Points. Information,<br />
Communication and Society <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=964950">link</a></p></blockquote>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read his papers yet, but they sound interesting and relevant to the issue of defaults.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: None of 3</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/08/08/in-default-defiance/comment-page-1/#comment-84652</link>
		<dc:creator>None of 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 13:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/08/08/in-default-defiance/#comment-84652</guid>
		<description>A common practise in many fast-food joints is to have, but not advertise, a free-refill policy.

Many fast-food joints now have customers fill their own drinks at machines that are largely unsupervised. It&#039;s possible to refill your drink at the machine, of course, and this seems to occur fairly often and without repercussions of any sort. (It&#039;s clearly even possible to bring your own container to fill, though they would probably object to that if they caught you doing it.)

Others still fill customer drinks for them, but offer free refills upon request.

All offer the up-front choice of small, medium, or large, or when you order a combo the option to supersize (among other things) the drink. This costs extra, and free refills obviously make it unsavvy to get any size other than either small or whatever comes in a combo without any supersizing.

A KFC near to where I live will refill a small coke TWICE without batting an eye, though push you to buy a large when you first order.

Once again, price-blind or just unsavvy consumers pay a premium, and the frugal pay a lower price for the same amount of drink...

Free refills (and free ketchup packets, or similarly) also exploit a pair of hidden social &quot;architectures of control&quot;.

One is that people have a limited capacity to consume such things at any given time. They get full. Condiments like ketchup are also generally undesired except in combination with a non-free food item; they taste too strong and are too minuscule to be of interest by themselves undiluted. The other is that there appears to be a social more of not taking extras to bring home. People may take ketchup packets they got from the bin but didn&#039;t use or a half-emptied drink in a disposable cup out with them, but don&#039;t take packets or get a free refill purely to take on the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A common practise in many fast-food joints is to have, but not advertise, a free-refill policy.</p>
<p>Many fast-food joints now have customers fill their own drinks at machines that are largely unsupervised. It&#8217;s possible to refill your drink at the machine, of course, and this seems to occur fairly often and without repercussions of any sort. (It&#8217;s clearly even possible to bring your own container to fill, though they would probably object to that if they caught you doing it.)</p>
<p>Others still fill customer drinks for them, but offer free refills upon request.</p>
<p>All offer the up-front choice of small, medium, or large, or when you order a combo the option to supersize (among other things) the drink. This costs extra, and free refills obviously make it unsavvy to get any size other than either small or whatever comes in a combo without any supersizing.</p>
<p>A KFC near to where I live will refill a small coke TWICE without batting an eye, though push you to buy a large when you first order.</p>
<p>Once again, price-blind or just unsavvy consumers pay a premium, and the frugal pay a lower price for the same amount of drink&#8230;</p>
<p>Free refills (and free ketchup packets, or similarly) also exploit a pair of hidden social &#8220;architectures of control&#8221;.</p>
<p>One is that people have a limited capacity to consume such things at any given time. They get full. Condiments like ketchup are also generally undesired except in combination with a non-free food item; they taste too strong and are too minuscule to be of interest by themselves undiluted. The other is that there appears to be a social more of not taking extras to bring home. People may take ketchup packets they got from the bin but didn&#8217;t use or a half-emptied drink in a disposable cup out with them, but don&#8217;t take packets or get a free refill purely to take on the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Printing &#187; Printing August 8, 2007 8:16 am</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/08/08/in-default-defiance/comment-page-1/#comment-84592</link>
		<dc:creator>Printing &#187; Printing August 8, 2007 8:16 am</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 12:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/08/08/in-default-defiance/#comment-84592</guid>
		<description>[...] In default, defiance As Gavin Clarke reports in The Register, this choice of default (the result of a tie-in between Adobe and FedEx) has irritated other printing companies and trade bodies sufficiently for Adobe to agree to remove the element from the &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In default, defiance As Gavin Clarke reports in The Register, this choice of default (the result of a tie-in between Adobe and FedEx) has irritated other printing companies and trade bodies sufficiently for Adobe to agree to remove the element from the &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: University Update - Linux - In default, defiance</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/08/08/in-default-defiance/comment-page-1/#comment-84589</link>
		<dc:creator>University Update - Linux - In default, defiance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 11:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/08/08/in-default-defiance/#comment-84589</guid>
		<description>[...] YouTube                Contact the Webmaster     Link to Article           linux In default, defiance &#187;  Posted at  fulminate // Architectures of Control on Wednesday, August 08, 2007  This article contains copywritten material. Please click on the &quot;View Original Article&quot; link below to view the article on the author&#039;s site.  View Original Article &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] YouTube                Contact the Webmaster     Link to Article           linux In default, defiance &#187;  Posted at  fulminate // Architectures of Control on Wednesday, August 08, 2007  This article contains copywritten material. Please click on the &quot;View Original Article&quot; link below to view the article on the author&#8217;s site.  View Original Article &#187; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

