<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some thoughts on classifications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/10/03/some-thoughts-on-classifications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/10/03/some-thoughts-on-classifications/</link>
	<description>How do people use products, systems and environments?  How can designers influence interaction?  How can we design for sustainable behaviour?</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Silverman</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/10/03/some-thoughts-on-classifications/#comment-101225</link>
		<dc:creator>Silverman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/10/03/some-thoughts-on-classifications/#comment-101225</guid>
		<description>Be careful. TRIZ endorses a dangerous notion that the intuition and intelligence used for solving design problems can all be shifted away from the designer and toward Altshuller and his generalized principles. Of course, you must use your engineering intuition to solve any problem, even one on which you've used TRIZ. But TRIZ seems to promote turning off that intuition until the last moment, when you work on embodying the system's four suggested solutions.

You know more about this type of design intent than almost everybody in the world. Please never turn off your engineering intuition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful. TRIZ endorses a dangerous notion that the intuition and intelligence used for solving design problems can all be shifted away from the designer and toward Altshuller and his generalized principles. Of course, you must use your engineering intuition to solve any problem, even one on which you&#8217;ve used TRIZ. But TRIZ seems to promote turning off that intuition until the last moment, when you work on embodying the system&#8217;s four suggested solutions.</p>
<p>You know more about this type of design intent than almost everybody in the world. Please never turn off your engineering intuition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/10/03/some-thoughts-on-classifications/#comment-101213</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 11:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/10/03/some-thoughts-on-classifications/#comment-101213</guid>
		<description>The Sten submachine gun comes to mind; the magazine was designed so that it could only be inserted in the gun one way - the right way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sten submachine gun comes to mind; the magazine was designed so that it could only be inserted in the gun one way - the right way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
