<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I believe in mirror-queues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/12/11/i-believe-in-mirror-queues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/12/11/i-believe-in-mirror-queues/</link>
	<description>How do people use products, systems and environments?  How can designers influence interaction?  How can we design for sustainable behaviour?</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leeann</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/12/11/i-believe-in-mirror-queues/#comment-131848</link>
		<dc:creator>Leeann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2007/12/11/i-believe-in-mirror-queues/#comment-131848</guid>
		<description>I understand the motive for reducing congestion at the sinks, but I'm curious as to what would be the purpose in reducing "primping" time at all--what social benefit does that control have? 

Washing one's hands in front of a mirror enables a woman to view (and analyze) her image without seeming to care, and it allows her to remain standing still in order to primp without seeming deliberate, because of course current middle-class culture values less emphasis on appearances and more on self-confidence. In moving the mirrors, a woman would have to be deliberate and she would feel the pressure that others might think she is being conceited, narcissistic, or insecurely obsessive.

Of course in moving the mirrors, the habit of obsessing over one's appearance (and making insignificant primps) is largely reduced (in public spaces anyway), which perhaps in the long run could be seen as a social benefit (but not without a social control dictating that benefit).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the motive for reducing congestion at the sinks, but I&#8217;m curious as to what would be the purpose in reducing &#8220;primping&#8221; time at all&#8211;what social benefit does that control have? </p>
<p>Washing one&#8217;s hands in front of a mirror enables a woman to view (and analyze) her image without seeming to care, and it allows her to remain standing still in order to primp without seeming deliberate, because of course current middle-class culture values less emphasis on appearances and more on self-confidence. In moving the mirrors, a woman would have to be deliberate and she would feel the pressure that others might think she is being conceited, narcissistic, or insecurely obsessive.</p>
<p>Of course in moving the mirrors, the habit of obsessing over one&#8217;s appearance (and making insignificant primps) is largely reduced (in public spaces anyway), which perhaps in the long run could be seen as a social benefit (but not without a social control dictating that benefit).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
