The semiotics of signs vs fences

Danger sign by a lightning-stricken tree in Windsor Great Park, Berkshire, 2008

Is the impact of the sign’s message increased or decreased by pairing it with a fence?

What about when the fence is flattened?

What about when no-one seems to have found it important to fix?

Why?

4 comments
  1. Tom J Nowell says: 30 December, 20086:15 pm

    Its the same effect shown in urban behaviour where a messier neighbourhood leads to worse public conduct. If you see people trampling all over a patch of grass with a keep off the grass sign obviously your more likely to ignore the sign.

    Here the fence being flattened shows the sign and fence are safe to ignore because somebody else probably has already

  2. Size says: 30 December, 20088:07 pm

    I think the automatic response is to say “If there were any true danger, someone would have bothered to repair the fence” and therefore to ignore both.

  3. Alex H. says: 30 December, 200810:45 pm

    I think the meaning would be very different if the fence had been trampled going the other direction…

  4. Vaishali Shah says: 15 May, 200910:16 am

    Hello,
    I am looking for guidence to do a doctrate in Semiotics linking it to my advertisng & marketing career.
    In anticipation
    V.

Submit comment

@danlockton

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

Upcoming talks & events

I'm speaking or running workshops at:

Some of my previous presentations

Comments & trackbacks

  • designfacilitators.com: with Intent Blog: http://architectures.danlockto n.co.uk/ Card Wiki: http://www.danlockton....
  • Tainted Stream: http://architectures.danlockto n.co.uk/2011/09/12/architectur e-urbanism-design-and-behav...
  • Betongelit: by individual seats, so that ”someone cannot lie down or occupy more than one” as one blogger...
  • Nick Interaction Design --- 交互设计: Anderson’s Mental Notes cards provide a fantastic set of behaviors to reference,...

Blog 2005-date