<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Persuasion for peace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2009/11/08/persuasion-for-peace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2009/11/08/persuasion-for-peace/</link>
	<description>Using design to influence behaviour</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:53:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How to Make People Believe You, Could it Be Magic?</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2009/11/08/persuasion-for-peace/comment-page-1/#comment-420173</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Make People Believe You, Could it Be Magic?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?p=1317#comment-420173</guid>
		<description>[...] Persuasion for peace [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Persuasion for peace [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peace dot &#171; soundtrckr</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2009/11/08/persuasion-for-peace/comment-page-1/#comment-418582</link>
		<dc:creator>peace dot &#171; soundtrckr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?p=1317#comment-418582</guid>
		<description>[...] name, the Stanford University Persuasive Technology Lab is doing a very happy thing. Their Peace Dot Initiative uses new media technology as a tool for building peace, aggregating resources that facilitate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] name, the Stanford University Persuasive Technology Lab is doing a very happy thing. Their Peace Dot Initiative uses new media technology as a tool for building peace, aggregating resources that facilitate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo Anne</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2009/11/08/persuasion-for-peace/comment-page-1/#comment-417595</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?p=1317#comment-417595</guid>
		<description>Kindly review www.grb.net

peace,

Jo Anne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kindly review <a href="http://www.grb.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.grb.net</a></p>
<p>peace,</p>
<p>Jo Anne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrique Allen</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2009/11/08/persuasion-for-peace/comment-page-1/#comment-415219</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrique Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?p=1317#comment-415219</guid>
		<description>Thank you Dan for the post, we really appreciate your support and feedback!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Dan for the post, we really appreciate your support and feedback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2009/11/08/persuasion-for-peace/comment-page-1/#comment-414592</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?p=1317#comment-414592</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve updated the post slightly to include a couple of clarifications from BJ about how the Peace Dot project is only part of Stanford&#039;s work in Peace Innovation, and that the 30-year goal applies to the &lt;em&gt;whole spectrum&lt;/em&gt; of possible peace efforts through technology, rather than Peace Dot itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve updated the post slightly to include a couple of clarifications from BJ about how the Peace Dot project is only part of Stanford&#8217;s work in Peace Innovation, and that the 30-year goal applies to the <em>whole spectrum</em> of possible peace efforts through technology, rather than Peace Dot itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wee Gran</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/2009/11/08/persuasion-for-peace/comment-page-1/#comment-414585</link>
		<dc:creator>Wee Gran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?p=1317#comment-414585</guid>
		<description>Some fine day. But in the meantime, prudence dictates we must walk softly and carry a big stick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some fine day. But in the meantime, prudence dictates we must walk softly and carry a big stick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.388 seconds -->
