<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Architectures of Control in the Built Environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/architectures-of-control-in-the-built-environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk</link>
	<description>Using design to influence behaviour</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:53:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: elmorsa.pe &#187; De Bentham a Berners-Lee</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/architectures-of-control-in-the-built-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-408441</link>
		<dc:creator>elmorsa.pe &#187; De Bentham a Berners-Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?page_id=4#comment-408441</guid>
		<description>[...] Panóptico. Fuente: Desing with intent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Panóptico. Fuente: Desing with intent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architecture And Everything Except The Helsinki &#171; adamantine</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/architectures-of-control-in-the-built-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-160290</link>
		<dc:creator>Architecture And Everything Except The Helsinki &#171; adamantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?page_id=4#comment-160290</guid>
		<description>[...] See also: architectures of control, a phrase originally coined by Lawrence Lessig. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See also: architectures of control, a phrase originally coined by Lawrence Lessig. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disciplinary spaces of architecture &#171; Foucault blog</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/architectures-of-control-in-the-built-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-80771</link>
		<dc:creator>Disciplinary spaces of architecture &#171; Foucault blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?page_id=4#comment-80771</guid>
		<description>[...] Jul 22nd, 2007 by Jeremy    Examples courtesy of Architectures of Control [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jul 22nd, 2007 by Jeremy    Examples courtesy of Architectures of Control [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some more architectures of control for traffic management at fulminate // Architectures of Control</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/architectures-of-control-in-the-built-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-26600</link>
		<dc:creator>Some more architectures of control for traffic management at fulminate // Architectures of Control</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?page_id=4#comment-26600</guid>
		<description>[...] Many of the &#8216;built environment&#8217; examples discussed here over the last year-and-a-bit have been intended to control (or &#8220;manage&#8221;) traffic in some way, e.g to slow drivers down, force them to take an alternative route, or force them to stop. I thought it would be worth mentioning a couple of other methods, the rationales behind them, and some of the problems: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Many of the &#8216;built environment&#8217; examples discussed here over the last year-and-a-bit have been intended to control (or &#8220;manage&#8221;) traffic in some way, e.g to slow drivers down, force them to take an alternative route, or force them to stop. I thought it would be worth mentioning a couple of other methods, the rationales behind them, and some of the problems: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Bruce Schneier : Architecture &#38; Security</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/architectures-of-control-in-the-built-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-11347</link>
		<dc:creator>Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Bruce Schneier : Architecture &#38; Security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?page_id=4#comment-11347</guid>
		<description>[...] The commenters detail a fantastic array of &#8216;disciplinary architecture&#8216; examples, including: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The commenters detail a fantastic array of &#8216;disciplinary architecture&#8216; examples, including: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architectures of Control in Design &#187; &#8216;Anti-Homeless&#8217; benches in Tokyo</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/architectures-of-control-in-the-built-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-10126</link>
		<dc:creator>Architectures of Control in Design &#187; &#8216;Anti-Homeless&#8217; benches in Tokyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?page_id=4#comment-10126</guid>
		<description>[...] Yumiko Hayakawa has a very thoughtful and well-illustrated article at OhMyNews on the story behind the variety of &#8216;anti-homeless&#8217; benches and architectural features (including public art) in Tokyo&#8217;s parks and public areas - by making it difficult or impossible to lie down. (We&#8217;ve looked briefly before at benches with central armrests before, along with anti-sit devices and of course anti-skateboarding measures - &#8216;disciplinary architecture&#8216;) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yumiko Hayakawa has a very thoughtful and well-illustrated article at OhMyNews on the story behind the variety of &#8216;anti-homeless&#8217; benches and architectural features (including public art) in Tokyo&#8217;s parks and public areas &#8211; by making it difficult or impossible to lie down. (We&#8217;ve looked briefly before at benches with central armrests before, along with anti-sit devices and of course anti-skateboarding measures &#8211; &#8216;disciplinary architecture&#8216;) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Flowing Candy Bees &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Architectures of control and &#8220;PRM&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/architectures-of-control-in-the-built-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-5094</link>
		<dc:creator>The Flowing Candy Bees &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Architectures of control and &#8220;PRM&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?page_id=4#comment-5094</guid>
		<description>[...] Mr. Lockton has a related page on control in urban planning. Check it out; this subject is of ever increasing relevance with the rise of DRM. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mr. Lockton has a related page on control in urban planning. Check it out; this subject is of ever increasing relevance with the rise of DRM. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Gleed</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/architectures-of-control-in-the-built-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-1159</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Gleed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?page_id=4#comment-1159</guid>
		<description>Architectures of control could be a good thing in some cases. In my local park, a big problem is motorcycles illegally riding around causing a danger to others, as well as being an anti-social nuisance. When you contact the police or the council, they maintain there is nothing to be done in case a chase results in injury. I tell them what is needed are &#039;architectures of control&#039; i.e. anti-motorcyles gates on the entrances, or a park warden etc. These are attempts by me to stop conflict by tackling the root cause (it is too easy to get in!). I fully agree with your article in Engineering Designer though, that sealed bonnets on cars etc, will reduce the innovation and capability of future engineers who cannot &#039;tinker&#039;. Another issue are toys, such as lego or meccano, which are being ignored in favour of the &#039;gameboy&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Architectures of control could be a good thing in some cases. In my local park, a big problem is motorcycles illegally riding around causing a danger to others, as well as being an anti-social nuisance. When you contact the police or the council, they maintain there is nothing to be done in case a chase results in injury. I tell them what is needed are &#8216;architectures of control&#8217; i.e. anti-motorcyles gates on the entrances, or a park warden etc. These are attempts by me to stop conflict by tackling the root cause (it is too easy to get in!). I fully agree with your article in Engineering Designer though, that sealed bonnets on cars etc, will reduce the innovation and capability of future engineers who cannot &#8216;tinker&#8217;. Another issue are toys, such as lego or meccano, which are being ignored in favour of the &#8216;gameboy&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architectures of Control in Design &#187; BBC: Safe, secure and kitsch</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/architectures-of-control-in-the-built-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Architectures of Control in Design &#187; BBC: Safe, secure and kitsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?page_id=4#comment-692</guid>
		<description>[...] Aside from the kitschness (hey, I&#8217;m not one to criticise!), some of Matthias&#8217; work touches on an interesting area pertinent to &#8216;built environment&#8217; architectures of control: the &#8216;hidden agenda&#8217; behind superficially pretty or aesthetically attractive designs: &#8220;Examples of Mr Megyeri&#8217;s art include&#8230; glass fir trees embedded in concrete, designed to replace broken bottle shards, which are now illegal. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Aside from the kitschness (hey, I&#8217;m not one to criticise!), some of Matthias&#8217; work touches on an interesting area pertinent to &#8216;built environment&#8217; architectures of control: the &#8216;hidden agenda&#8217; behind superficially pretty or aesthetically attractive designs: &#8220;Examples of Mr Megyeri&#8217;s art include&#8230; glass fir trees embedded in concrete, designed to replace broken bottle shards, which are now illegal. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Making a sleek piece from a pig&#8217;s ear</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/architectures-of-control-in-the-built-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Making a sleek piece from a pig&#8217;s ear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?page_id=4#comment-320</guid>
		<description>[...] A significant proportion of people who come across this website have searched for &#8220;skate deterrent&#8221; or &#8220;skateboarding control&#8221; or something along those lines; I don&#8217;t know what the split is between those who are &#8216;for&#8217;, &#8216;against&#8217; or just &#8216;interested in&#8217; disciplinary architecture of this kind. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A significant proportion of people who come across this website have searched for &#8220;skate deterrent&#8221; or &#8220;skateboarding control&#8221; or something along those lines; I don&#8217;t know what the split is between those who are &#8216;for&#8217;, &#8216;against&#8217; or just &#8216;interested in&#8217; disciplinary architecture of this kind. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Telegraph - Safety fear swats store&#8217;s Mosquito</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/architectures-of-control-in-the-built-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Telegraph - Safety fear swats store&#8217;s Mosquito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 08:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?page_id=4#comment-192</guid>
		<description>[...] I note that another Telegraph story on the Mosquito, from last month, lists Staffordshire Police and Rochdale Council as two publicly funded bodies which have started using the devices - thus, along with skateboarding deterrents, we really do have public money being spent on devices designed to cause injury, damage or discomfort to certain parts of the population. I don&#8217;t think I like that. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I note that another Telegraph story on the Mosquito, from last month, lists Staffordshire Police and Rochdale Council as two publicly funded bodies which have started using the devices &#8211; thus, along with skateboarding deterrents, we really do have public money being spent on devices designed to cause injury, damage or discomfort to certain parts of the population. I don&#8217;t think I like that. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Architectures of control that actually endanger life</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/architectures-of-control-in-the-built-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Architectures of control that actually endanger life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 23:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?page_id=4#comment-177</guid>
		<description>[...] What other examples are there? I guess the Mosquito might cause hearing damage but it&#8217;s probably not life-threatening. Child-proof lids on medicine bottles, child-proof door locks on cars and other simple control can certainly cause unintended problems for adults too - for example, if someone has arthritis it may be difficult to open a child-proof pill bottle. A car throttle preventing excessive revving could also prevent a motorist accelerating to avoid danger. Skateboarding deterrents can cause injury: in fact, if they are not specifically signed as being there but are introduced without warning, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going too far that to say they are specifically intended to cause injury and damage, and in most cases their installation is funded with public money. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What other examples are there? I guess the Mosquito might cause hearing damage but it&#8217;s probably not life-threatening. Child-proof lids on medicine bottles, child-proof door locks on cars and other simple control can certainly cause unintended problems for adults too &#8211; for example, if someone has arthritis it may be difficult to open a child-proof pill bottle. A car throttle preventing excessive revving could also prevent a motorist accelerating to avoid danger. Skateboarding deterrents can cause injury: in fact, if they are not specifically signed as being there but are introduced without warning, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going too far that to say they are specifically intended to cause injury and damage, and in most cases their installation is funded with public money. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Richard Stallman&#8217;s &#8216;Right To Read&#8217; dystopia growing closer every day</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/architectures-of-control-in-the-built-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Richard Stallman&#8217;s &#8216;Right To Read&#8217; dystopia growing closer every day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 18:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?page_id=4#comment-99</guid>
		<description>[...] This is essentially &#8216;disciplinary architecture&#8216;, or as Andreas Bovens has put it, &#8220;every use that is not specifically permitted by the&#8230; provider is in fact prohibited.&#8221; DRM of this kind is using technology to enforce &#8216;laws&#8217; (often not actually laws, but just arbitrary sets of conditions) without the benefit of evidence, a jury or due process, and with no way of appealing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is essentially &#8216;disciplinary architecture&#8216;, or as Andreas Bovens has put it, &#8220;every use that is not specifically permitted by the&#8230; provider is in fact prohibited.&#8221; DRM of this kind is using technology to enforce &#8216;laws&#8217; (often not actually laws, but just arbitrary sets of conditions) without the benefit of evidence, a jury or due process, and with no way of appealing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/architectures-of-control-in-the-built-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 21:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?page_id=4#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Hi Peter,

Thank you, that&#039;s a good point, and I suppose that kind of psychological &#039;control&#039; through &lt;i&gt;actual&lt;/i&gt; architecture is a whole field in itself, and probably a point of much debate among architects and planners (e.g. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.designcommunity.com/discussion/19627.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.designcommunity.com/discussion/19627.html&lt;/a&gt;).

In the sense that inspiring awe (or outright fear) can be used to control people, it is certainly an &#039;architecture of control&#039;, though most of the examples on this site are more about specific design features which prevent or enforce certain behaviours (there are a few psychological examples, such as the cone cup to discourage littering, as in the Judge, but even that relies on a functional product architecture). 

It&#039;s interesting, regarding the &#039;tall building inspiring fear of God&#039; phenomenon, to read the descriptions of Hopton Stoddard&#039;s &#039;Temple of the Human Spirit&#039; in Ayn Rand&#039;s &lt;i&gt;The Fountainhead&lt;/i&gt;—the brief was for it to: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;capture—in stone, as others capture in music—not some narrow creed but the essence of all religion... the great aspiration of the human spirit towards the highest, the noblest, the best. The human spirit as the creator and conqueror of the ideal. The great life-giving force of the universe. The heroic human spirit.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Howard Roark, architect, responds with:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;a small building of grey limestone. Its lines were horizontal, not the lines reaching to heaven, but the lines of the earth. It seemed to spread over the ground like arms outstretched at shoulder-height, palms down, in great, silent acceptance... It was scaled to human height in such a manner that it did not dwarf man, but stood as a setting that made his figure the only absolute, the gauge of perfection by which all dimensions were to be judged... It was a place where one would come to feel sinless and strong, to find the peace of spirit never granted save by one&#039;s own glory.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If anyone has any other observations/examples of psychological (or other) control being designed into environments, please, comment away.

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter,</p>
<p>Thank you, that&#8217;s a good point, and I suppose that kind of psychological &#8216;control&#8217; through <i>actual</i> architecture is a whole field in itself, and probably a point of much debate among architects and planners (e.g. <a href="http://www.designcommunity.com/discussion/19627.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.designcommunity.com/discussion/19627.html</a>).</p>
<p>In the sense that inspiring awe (or outright fear) can be used to control people, it is certainly an &#8216;architecture of control&#8217;, though most of the examples on this site are more about specific design features which prevent or enforce certain behaviours (there are a few psychological examples, such as the cone cup to discourage littering, as in the Judge, but even that relies on a functional product architecture). </p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting, regarding the &#8216;tall building inspiring fear of God&#8217; phenomenon, to read the descriptions of Hopton Stoddard&#8217;s &#8216;Temple of the Human Spirit&#8217; in Ayn Rand&#8217;s <i>The Fountainhead</i>—the brief was for it to: </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;capture—in stone, as others capture in music—not some narrow creed but the essence of all religion&#8230; the great aspiration of the human spirit towards the highest, the noblest, the best. The human spirit as the creator and conqueror of the ideal. The great life-giving force of the universe. The heroic human spirit.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Howard Roark, architect, responds with:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;a small building of grey limestone. Its lines were horizontal, not the lines reaching to heaven, but the lines of the earth. It seemed to spread over the ground like arms outstretched at shoulder-height, palms down, in great, silent acceptance&#8230; It was scaled to human height in such a manner that it did not dwarf man, but stood as a setting that made his figure the only absolute, the gauge of perfection by which all dimensions were to be judged&#8230; It was a place where one would come to feel sinless and strong, to find the peace of spirit never granted save by one&#8217;s own glory.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>If anyone has any other observations/examples of psychological (or other) control being designed into environments, please, comment away.</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Moar</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/architectures-of-control-in-the-built-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Moar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?page_id=4#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Dan,

It is argued that one of the principal reasons for constructing spiritual buildings and sculptures on such a &#039;monumental&#039; scale is the desire by their architects to instil awe, and hence control, among the &#039;masses&#039;.  The psychology appears to be: &#039;only an immovable or eternal force could create something so massive and beautiful...so resistance is futile.&#039;

We began to worship money, and hence skyscrapers, in the twentieth century, but before then, the tallest buildings in the World were often, if not always, Christian cathedrals.  Similarly, in Communist states secular monuments often dominated the skylines (and still do in North Korea).  I believe that these are all examples of &#039;architectures of control&#039;?

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>
<p>It is argued that one of the principal reasons for constructing spiritual buildings and sculptures on such a &#8216;monumental&#8217; scale is the desire by their architects to instil awe, and hence control, among the &#8216;masses&#8217;.  The psychology appears to be: &#8216;only an immovable or eternal force could create something so massive and beautiful&#8230;so resistance is futile.&#8217;</p>
<p>We began to worship money, and hence skyscrapers, in the twentieth century, but before then, the tallest buildings in the World were often, if not always, Christian cathedrals.  Similarly, in Communist states secular monuments often dominated the skylines (and still do in North Korea).  I believe that these are all examples of &#8216;architectures of control&#8217;?</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Motor insurance &#8216;black boxes&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/architectures-of-control-in-the-built-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Architectures of Control in Design &#187; Motor insurance &#8216;black boxes&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://architectures.danlockton.co.uk/?page_id=4#comment-6</guid>
		<description>[...] Last month, Norwich Union (one of the UK&#8217;s largest insurers) opened up its &#8216;black box&#8217;-based car insurance policy (see here) to a wider range of drivers, with a lot of publicity. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last month, Norwich Union (one of the UK&#8217;s largest insurers) opened up its &#8216;black box&#8217;-based car insurance policy (see here) to a wider range of drivers, with a lot of publicity. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.723 seconds -->
